1. Introduction
What makes life possible is not simply the ability to move or react, but the capacity to maintain order amid constant change. Long before cognition or consciousness, living systems developed the means to preserve their own structure, repair what is damaged, and sustain coherence in the face of entropy. This intrinsic capacity for self-maintenance forms the hidden architecture of survival.

This article explores biological organization as the structural logic of self-preservation. From metabolism and repair to immunity and reproduction, it examines how the living system is designed not merely to exist, but to actively defend its integrity across multiple levels—from the molecular to the behavioral. In this view, defence is not an accessory to life but the organizing principle that allows life to persist through time.

2. Survival as Structure and Behavior
Survival can be understood through two complementary lenses: behavior and structure. If the behavioral logic of survival is revealed through defensive action, then its structural logic lies within biological organization itself. A living system is not a passive object waiting to endure until decay but an active, dynamic process of self-maintenance. It must continually resist entropy, repair itself, and sustain coherence. As Erwin Schrödinger argued in What Is Life?, organisms maintain their improbable order only by importing energy and expelling disorder.[1]

This coherence is organic in character: life is structured less like a machine assembled from the outside and more like an organism that produces and sustains itself from within.[2] Living systems are open systems, dependent on flows of matter and energy that counteract disintegration. To cease this work of maintenance is, for an organism, to die.[3]

3. What Is a Living System
To understand how life defends itself, we must look beyond behavior to the structural mechanisms that make persistence possible. This section introduces the concepts of self-production and organizational closure as ways of explaining how living systems generate and sustain themselves from within. It also considers the concrete functions—metabolism, regulation, repair, and reproduction—that anchor this architecture of survival. Here the focus shifts from external behavior to internal structure, showing how the very organization of life is inseparable from defence.

To specify more closely what it means to be alive, we must examine the functions through which organisms sustain themselves. Survival requires continuous processes of metabolism, regulation, repair, and reproduction—mechanisms that effectively resist entropy and preserve coherence across levels of organization. Organisms achieve this through openness: they exchange energy and matter with their environments in order to endure. [4] Living systems persist only by countering disintegration; once this capacity ends, so does the organism’s viability.

A key defining feature of living systems is active self-production. They continually generate and regenerate the very components that keep them intact—a process famously described by Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela as autopoiesis, the continuous self-manufacture of components. This is further sustained by organizational closure, the interdependent network of functional processes that secure that production.[5] As Evan Thompson explains, closure does not mean isolation, but rather is a form of internal coherence that enables viable interaction with an environment. In other words, an organism is organized in such a way that it actively defends its own continuity.[6]

Survival depends on concrete functions that accomplish this work. Metabolism supplies energy, homeostatic regulation preserves internal conditions, repair mechanisms restore what is damaged, and reproduction secures continuity across generations. As Bruce Alberts and colleagues note, these are not incidental processes but constitutive of life itself: without them, organisms collapse into disorder.[7] Alongside energy flow, life also depends on information storage and transfer—genetic codes and signaling pathways that coordinate development, repair, and adaptation.[8]

Together, these processes instantiate autopoiesis and organizational closure: the network of mutually supporting activities through which an organism produces and sustains its identity.[9] Thompson further emphasizes, that to be alive is not merely to exist, but to continually enact the structural and functional conditions of one’s survival.[10] Seen this way, the very organization of life is already inherent defensive—an architecture designed to resist entropy and preserve coherence against threat.

4. Life-Sustaining Functions and Their Defensive Logic
To grasp this more fully, we must ask how maintenance is actually accomplished by exploring the concrete functions that enact this practice. From cellular metabolism and DNA replication to tissue repair and immune defence, these functions form the operational basis of biological organization. Bruce Alberts and colleagues explain in Molecular Biology of the Cell, these processes ensure that essential functions continue without interruption.[11] Taken together, they reveal that the structural logic of life is inseparable from defence: to live is to resist disorder, repair damage, and preserve integrity against dissolution.

Metabolism supplies energy and raw material, fueling the work of repair, growth, and movement. Without metabolic flow, no other life-sustaining function can operate. As Alberts emphasizes, the cell’s viability depends on continuous energy exchange with its environment—a defensive economy that mobilizes against starvation, collapse, and decay. [12] Within this system, anabolism builds and fortifies—storing energy, repairing damage, and generating new structure—while catabolism breaks down molecules to release energy for immediate action. Together they mirror the larger logic of self-defence: maintaining internal stability while meeting external demands for survival.

 Homeostasis regulates internal conditions, stabilizing temperature, pH, and other vital parameters. Walter Cannon first defined homeostasis as the body’s ability to maintain internal stability amid external change.[13] Allostasis, a concept developed by Peter Sterling and expanded by Bruce McEwen, further extends this principle by anticipating change—mobilizing energy in advance of demand, and before exertion.[14] Together, these mechanisms buffer shocks and prepare organisms to withstand stress, transforming regulation into a proactive form of defence.

Reproduction extends the logic of self-preservation beyond the individual organism. While not essential for moment-to-moment survival, it secures the continuity of life through renewal, ensuring that the organization of the living system endures beyond the lifespan of its components. In this sense, reproduction functions as a structural defence against extinction, preserving the informational and genetic integrity of the species across generations. It transforms biological persistence from a momentary act of survival into a sustained lineage of continuity through time.

Repair and immunity safeguard integrity by detecting and correcting damage before it destabilizes the system. These functions restore tissues, neutralize pathogens, and maintain the critical distinction between self and non-self—a principle foundational to modern immunology, as Kenneth Murphy and Casey Weaver emphasize in Janeway’s Immunobiology. [15] Their role is not incidental but central: without them, disorder would accumulate unchecked, undermining survival. The specific mechanisms—ranging from cellular clearance processes to tumour suppression—demonstrate how defence operates at multiple scales. This layered organization is developed more fully in the next section, which examines how defensive functions interlock across molecular, cellular, systemic, and behavioral levels.

Information integrity safeguards the instructions of life. Genetic fidelity is preserved through DNA proofreading and error correction, while proteostasis ensures proper protein folding and function. Alberts and colleagues describe how molecular chaperones and DNA repair enzymes preserve informational integrity,[16] while epigenetic regulation coordinates developmental and adaptive responses that ensure survival under changing condition.[17] Together, these mechanisms prevent the informational collapse that would otherwise undermine survival.

The architecture of biological organization is both intricate and resilient, binding structure, information, and energy[18] into a defensive whole. [19] Crucially, these functions are organized across multiple levels of complexity, ensuring that local disruptions—such as cellular mutations or systemic shocks—can be absorbed, compensated, or repaired at higher levels. In this sense, defence is not an accessory to life but more fundamentally is the structural logic binding its functions together, and the background condition that enables survival to persist through time.[20]

5. Defence as a Multilevel Imperative
Above, we briefly examined some of the core functions that sustain life; here, the focus shifts to how those functions are organized across levels of biological complexity. Defence operates through a hierarchy of interdependent layers, each reinforcing and sustaining the next.

At the molecular and cellular levels, processes such as DNA repair, proteostasis, apoptosis, and autophagy preserve integrity by correcting errors, removing damaged components, and maintaining the distinction between self and non-self. Douglas Hanahan emphasizes apoptosis as a central tumour-suppressive defence in his updated framework of cancer biology, [21] while Noboru Mizushima and Beth Levine identify autophagy as a critical mechanism for maintaining cellular integrity and preventing disease. [22] Together, these mechanisms form the ground floor of biological resilience, ensuring that disorder at even the smallest scales does not cascade into systemic collapse.

Above this foundation, defence scales upward into systemic coordination. Nervous and endocrine networks orchestrate detection and mobilization. Walter Cannon first identified the autonomic nervous system’s role in rapid physiological adjustment, [23] and modern stress research—previously referenced by Bruce McEwen and Peter Gianaros—showing how the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis mobilizes energy and primes cardiovascular, muscular, and perceptual systems for survival. [24]

At the behavioral level, organisms enact protective strategies in real time: fleeing, fighting, freezing, bluffing, or cooperating. Classic ethology, from Niko Tinbergen onward, shows how such behaviors are context-sensitive and often ritualized, reducing risk while maintaining defensive effectiveness. [25]

These layers are interdependent and mutually sustaining. Molecular and cellular repair underwrite systemic stability; systemic coordination enables coherent behavior; and behavior, in turn, secures the conditions for all lower levels to function. Defence is therefore not an added feature of life but its multilevel architecture—the scaffold that enables organisms to endure, adapt, and act. [26]

Taken together, these interlocking layers reveal that defence is not simply a collection of mechanisms but an integrated architecture. Their coherence reflects a deeper imperative—self-preservation[27]—which unifies the organism’s operations across all scales. This foundational drive provides the bridge to the next section, where the focus turns to self-preservation as the organizing principle of life itself.

6. Self-Preservation as the Foundational Survival Task
This multilevel defense as described above ultimately converges on a single imperative and organizing principle: self-preservation. Every organism must preserve its organization against the constant threat of entropy and dissolution. Already previously mentioned, this imperative is captured in the concept of autopoiesis, describing the ongoing production and regeneration of the very components that sustain the system as a whole.[28] Together, autopoiesis highlights the dynamic of continuous self-production, while organizational closure emphasizes the circular or self-referential interdependence of processes that sustain this production.[29] These concepts show how living systems are thermodynamically open—drawing in energy and matter, exporting entropy and waste—yet organizationally closed, maintaining functional identity through internally generated processes.[30]

To sustain this continuity, organisms must discriminate amongst the countless environmental inputs, orienting themselves to what is most relevant for survival. This process—what John Vervaeke calls “relevance realization” [31]—ensures that defensive activity remains directed towards what truly matters, filtering signal from noise. In this sense, self-preservation is not only metabolic and structural but also interpretive: it requires the capacity to register salient threats, opportunities, and affordances within a shifting environment.[32]

Thompson deepens this view by stressing that life is not merely a static condition but a rather a ceaseless process of renewal. Life should be seen less as a fixed state and more as a dynamic architecture of self-maintenance,[33] continually orchestrating processes that stave off dissolution. On this reading, defence is not something added to life from the outside but the very activity of life itself—the ongoing effort to preserve coherence in the face of entropy.[34]

From this imperative of self-preservation emerges biological autonomy: the minimal form of self-regulation that secures identity from within. At this point, survival shifts from mere endurance to organized self-regulation, establishing the bridge to more complex forms of autonomy. This bridge leads directly to the next stage: natural autonomy—the organism’s capacity to regulate itself through active engagement with its environment, extending the logic of self-preservation outward into adaptive coordination with a changing world.[35]

7. Biological Autonomy as a Precursor to Moral Autonomy
From the principles of autopoiesis and organizational closure outlined earlier arises a basic form of biological autonomy. A living system persists not because it is carried forward by external forces, but because it organizes and regulates itself from within. In this sense, Maturana and Varela describe autonomy as more than just self-production: it is the capacity to absorb disturbance, repair what is damaged, and preserve functional integrity in the face of dynamic change.[36]

This form of autonomy, however, does not yet amount to agency or moral freedom. It sustains viability but it does not deliberate, intend, or judge—it simply enacts the self-sustaining patterns that make such capacities possible. Evan Thompson notes, even minimal forms of autonomy are foundational, but they do not yet imply conscious intention or moral responsibility.[37] In evolutionary terms, every biological organism that endures embodies this minimal autonomy, yet only certain lineages extend it into increasingly complex forms of interaction, adaptation, and eventually cognition.[38]

8. Concluding Remarks
For this reason, biological autonomy provides the conceptual ground on which all higher orders of autonomy rest. It furnishes the inner architecture of life, sustaining the coherence that makes outward engagement possible. As Xabier Barandiaran, Ezequiel Di Paolo, and Marieke Rohde observe, the transition from basic self-regulation to interactive autonomy marks a conceptual bridge toward cognition and moral agency. [39] In this sense, self-preservation becomes not merely endurance, but active coordination with a changing world—the foundation from which adaptive and ethical life emerge. [40]

Seen as a whole, biological organization reveals that life defends itself not only through behavior, but through structure. Every organism, from the simplest cell to the most complex being, sustains itself through networks of repair, renewal, and regulation that resist disorder. To live is to engage in an unending process of defence—an internal architecture that safeguards coherence against entropy and time.

This logic of self-preservation gives rise to biological autonomy—the capacity of living systems to organize and regulate themselves from within. It marks the foundation on which higher forms of autonomy are built: natural, cognitive, and moral. Understanding this foundation reframes defence not as aggression, but as the organizing rhythm of life itself—the active maintenance of order in a world of change.

In this light, biological organization becomes more than structure—it is an expression of vitality. It shows that life, in all its forms, is a continuous act of resistance against disintegration, a disciplined equilibrium that allows every living being to persist, adapt, and evolve.

→ Excerpt from our flagship publication here.